XADM: Slow Client Logon Due to Missing Addressing TemplateLast reviewed: February 12, 1998Article ID: Q177308 |
The information in this article applies to:
SYMPTOMSThe following are symptoms of this issue:
Slow client logons (up to 10 minutes or more) during peak logon hours or even relatively slow logons for solitary or small group logons. In the Windows NT Performance Monitor (PerfMon), Process, % CPU utilization, DSAMAIN.EXE (DS) will sustain a very high CPU utilization percentage (75% or more) throughout the peak logon periods. In addition, the DS may jump up high for relatively long times (1-4 minutes) for solitary or small group logons (~5). Enabling the Directory Service logging, ExDS interface logging to maximum will log numerous "ds_read entered" and "ds_read completed" events (1136 and 1137, respectively). Also, enabling maximum MAPI interface, logs NspiBind events (1136 - client and otherwise). A network trace between the Exchange client and server may show that a long time elapses between when the first RPC OpNum2 request to the Store’s GUID is issued, and when the server actually returns an RPC response to this request. CAUSEWhen the client logs on, a comparison between the existence of One-off address templates in the directory, and the Address-Types in the ODI cache of the Store is performed. If an address-type exists in the ODI cache, but a corresponding address template does not exist in the DS, a flag is set to reload the ODI cache. The cache is reloaded, but the flag is never reset, so a cache reload is continually signaled. The logon process is serialized behind this cache reload. This can noticeably impact logon if:
WORKAROUND- Make sure that there is a one-off addressing template installed within the Site for any non-native Exchange address-type.- Examine \exchsrvr\mtadata\GWART0.MTA to derive a list of unique address types.- View the list of installed one-off address templates under:
<org>/<local-sitename>/Configuration/Addressing/One-off Address Templates/<language> STATUSMicrosoft has confirmed this to be a problem in Microsoft Exchange Server version 4.0. A supported fix is now available, but has not been fully regression-tested and should be applied only to systems experiencing this specific problem. Unless you are severely impacted by this specific problem, Microsoft recommends that you wait for the next Service Pack that contains this fix. Contact Microsoft Technical Support for more information. Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in Microsoft Exchange Server version 5.0. This problem has been corrected in the latest U.S. Service Pack for Microsoft Exchange Server version 5.0. For information on obtaining the Service Pack, query on the following word in the Microsoft Knowledge Base (without the spaces): S E R V P A C K
MORE INFORMATIONA code change has been implemented to discriminate between the cases when an address template is "not found" versus the case when "an error occurred looking for an address template". The reload flag is no longer signaled for the former case. This case involved a single server Microsoft Exchange version 4.0 site that had replicated with the rest of the organization, which included a mix of Exchange 4.0 and 5.0 sites and servers. One of the 5.0 sites had implemented a CCMAIL connector to an extensive cc:Mail installation. This resulted in many CCMAIL routes being added into the routing table (GWART). These routing entries were replicated throughout the organization. Exchange 5.0 supports the CCMAIL address-type as a native Exchange address- type, and includes a One-off Address template for this address-type. Exchange 4.0 does not support the CCMAIL address-type as a native Exchange address- type. The solitary Exchange 4.0 Site did not have a CCMAIL One-off Address template installed, thus logons within this Site experienced this inefficiency. breakpoint breakpoint arrived? Keywords : kbbug4.00 kbbug5.00 kbfix5.00.sp2 XADM Version : 4.0 5.0 Platform : winnt Issue type : kbbug Solution Type : kbfix kbpatch |
================================================================================
© 1998 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use. |