FIX: Incorrect Code Generated If Operand Is [eax][eax]Last reviewed: September 16, 1997Article ID: Q78862 |
6.00 | 6.00
MS-DOS | OS/2
kbtool kbfixlist kbbuglist
The information in this article applies to:
SYMPTOMSIn the Microsoft Macro Assembler (MASM) version 6.0, incorrect code is generated for instructions, such as the following, using the operand [eax][eax]:
lea edi, [eax][eax] mov edi, [eax][eax] RESOLUTIONA workaround for this problem is to embed the opcode for the instruction directly in the code. The sample code below demonstrates this method.
STATUSMicrosoft has confirmed this to be a problem in MASM version 6.0. This problem was corrected in MASM version 6.0a.
MORE INFORMATIONA listing file from the following program will show that the instruction lea edi, [eax][eax] is encoded as 8D 3C 3A. However, the code actually placed into the executable is 8D 3C. The correct code in the case of lea edi, [eax][eax] is 8D 3C 00. Note that the operand [eax][eax] is available only when using the .386 or .486 directives.
Sample Code; Assembler options needed: none .386 .MODEL small CODE32 SEGMENT DWORD PUBLIC USE32 'CODE' ASSUME CS:CODE32 main PROC lea edi, [eax][eax] ; Replace this by BYTE 8Dh, 3Ch, 00h ; since the code generated by it is ; 8D 3C 3A, which is incorrect. mov edi, [eax][eax] ; Replace this by BYTE 8Bh, 3Ch, 00h ; since the code generated by it is ; 8B 3C 3A, which is incorrect. retmain ENDP CODE32 ENDS END main
|
Additional reference words: 6.00 buglist6.00 fixlist6.00a
© 1998 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use. |