X400: Differences Between, Advantages of Field & Type

Last reviewed: October 20, 1997
Article ID: Q86983
3.00 MS-DOS kb3rdparty

The information in this article applies to:

  • Microsoft Mail Gateway to X.400, version 3.0

SUMMARY

Field and type addressing templates are selected from the X.400 listing maintenance in the Admin program. The template used has two distinct differences:

  • The ability to enter address information
  • The presentation of the address to the user, should the user query the nature of the X.400 address.

MORE INFORMATION

The field addressing method uses a set of X.400 fields, each of which contains a template that helps the administrator enter the X.400 address information. The field entry also passes the information to the client interface, so users can see the template describing the complex X.400 address. The disadvantage to the field format is a restriction in the number of address variables available to the X.400 addressing. The template allows only for the most widely-used address variables.

A one-line template is used to enter the X.400 address information when the type address is selected. The disadvantage to the one-line template is its lack of user friendliness when a user requests additional information for a particular person's full name identification from the user list. The advantage to the one-line format is that it can enter all parameters available for the X.400 addresses.


Additional reference words: 3.00 pcmail
KBCategory: kb3rdparty
KBSubcategory: MailGWX400


THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.

Last reviewed: October 20, 1997
© 1998 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.