Dependent LU6.2 Session Fails With Event ID 14: INITSELF

Last reviewed: April 17, 1997
Article ID: Q148599
The information in this article applies to:
  • Microsoft SNA Server for Windows NT, versions 2.0, 2.1, 2.11 Service Pack 1, and 3.0

SYMPTOMS

When an SNA Server starts a dependent LU6.2 session to a host system, the SNA Server sends an INITSELF command to solicit a BIND command from the host. If there is a configuration mismatch between the SNA Server and the host (VTAM and subsystem, such as CICS) or if the host application is temporarily unavailable, then the host sends a negative response to the INITSELF command and the SNA Server logs a sense code in the Windows NT application event log:

   Event ID: 14
   Description: APPC session activation failure: INITSELF negative response
   received.

      Sense data   = <sense code>
      Connection   = <connection name>
      LU alias     = <Local LU alias>
      PLU alias    = <Remote LU alias>
      Mode name    = <mode name>
      LU address   = <Locaddr of Local LU>

NOTE: This event may start occurring after applying SNA Server 2.11 Service Pack 1 due to a change in the BIND verification for dependent APPC LU sessions. See below for more information.

CAUSE

An APPC session fails to start because the host has rejected the SNA INITSELF request sent to initiate the session. The data contains more information about the reason for the rejection. A common sense code which may be returned if a configuration mismatch exists is "1003xxxx", where 1003 indicates "Function Not Supported" and xxxx subcode indicates the sense code specific information.

Under SNA Server versions 2.0, 2.1 and 2.11, SNA Server does not check the local dependent APPC LU name received in a host BIND command. Under these versions, SNA Server simply checks if the host BIND contains the same User Request Correlation (URC) field that SNA Server specified in the preceding INIT-SELF command. However, to correct an SNA Server Admin problem which this caused (see KB article Q140835), the SNA Server 2.11 Service Pack 1 version will now reject a host BIND request on a dependent APPC LU session if the Local APPC LU name does not match the SLU name received in the BIND. This change in behavior will only be seen if the local APPC LU name is misconfigured (i.e. if it does not match the VTAM LU macro name for the dependent APPC LU).

RESOLUTION

To correct this problem, do the following (assuming that CICS is being used):

  1. The SNA Server Local APPC LU name must match the VTAM LU macro name (the LU name configured in the VTAMLST) and the CICS "Netname."

  2. The SNA Server Local APPC LU network name must match the VTAM NETID.

  3. The SNA Server Local APPC LU address (which is between 01-255 for dependent APPC LU's) must match the VTAM LU LOCADDR parameter.

  4. The SNA Server APPC mode name must match the VTAM LU DLOGMOD name.

  5. The SNA Server Remote APPC LU name and Uninterpreted LU name must match the CICS APPLID and VTAM APPLID (or ACBNAME).

  6. The SNA Server Remote APPC LU network name must match the VTAM NETID where CICS is running.

NOTE: The Local and Remote APPC LU alias names are only used by local APPC or CPIC applications (alias names are not sent between systems).

MORE INFORMATION

All the Sense Codes are listed in Chapter 9 of the IBM SNA Formats Guide (IBM document GA27-3136).

For more information in configuring independent and dependent LU6.2 and APPC for different IBM platforms (including CICS, AS/400, APPC/MVS, and APPC/VM), see the Multi-Platform APPC Configuration Guide (IBM document SV40-0089). This document is available on the APPC Forum (GO APPC) in CompuServe as MPCONT.ZIP.


Additional query words: prodsna
Keywords : kbnetwork ntnetserv snaappc
Version : 2.0 2.1 2.11 3.0
Platform : WINDOWS


THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.

Last reviewed: April 17, 1997
© 1998 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.