BUG: Incorrect Function Name Binding in Function TemplatesLast reviewed: July 24, 1997Article ID: Q138567 |
The information in this article applies to:
SYMPTOMSGiven a function template G whose definition includes a function call to F that does not depend on a template parameter, the compiler does not bind function names at the point of the template definition. Instead the compiler binds them when the function template is instantiated. This could cause unexpected runtime results.
CAUSEThis is a fairly recent change to the ANSI C++ working paper. The current version of the Microsoft compilers do not support this feature.
STATUSMicrosoft has confirmed this to be a bug in the Microsoft products listed at the beginning of this article. We are researching this bug and will post new information here in the Microsoft Knowledge Base as it becomes available.
MORE INFORMATIONBased on the ANSI C++ working paper draft (14.2.7), if a name can be bound at the point of the template definition and it is not a function called in a way that depends on a template parameter, it will be bound at the template definition point and the binding is not affected by later declarations.
Sample Code to Demonstrate Problem
/* Compile options needed: Default */ #include <iostream.h> void F(char) { cout << "In F(char)" << endl; } template <class T> void G( T t ) { F(1); // F() is not dependent on T or t } void F(int) { cout <<"In F(int)" << endl; } void main() { G(2); G('a'); } /* The output from the program */ In F(int) In F(int) /* The output should be */ In F(char) In F(char) |
Additional query words: 9.00 10.00 10.10 10.20
© 1998 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use. |