PRB: Incorrect Usage of CSingleLock May Lock Up Mutex ObjectLast reviewed: July 31, 1997Article ID: Q151869 |
4.10
WINDOWS NT
kbprg kbprb
The information in this article applies to:
SYMPTOMSThe CSingleLock class can be used with a CMutex object. An attempt to free the Mutex object by making a call to the documented function CSingleLock::Unlock(LONG, LPLONG) locks up the Mutex. The Mutex is not released even when the CSingleLock object is destroyed. Instead, the call to CSingleLock::Unlock(void) successfully frees the Mutex.
CAUSEThere is a Boolean variable kept in the class CSingleLock - m_bAcquired. This variable keeps track of the state of the synchronization object. In the case of Mutexes, a value of TRUE (.T.) means that the Mutex object is owned by a thread. The variable is set to FALSE (.F.) when the Mutex is freed. There are two versions of CSingleLock::Unlock and two versions for CSyncObject::Unlock. One version takes no arguments, while the other one takes two: LONG and LPLONG. CSingleLock::Unlock makes a call to CSyncObject::Unlock only if the m_bAcquired member of CSingleLock is set to TRUE. Of the two versions of CSingleLock::Unlock, the latter version, with two arguments, should be used only with CSingleLock associated with CSemaphore objects. When used on a CSingleLock object associated with a CMutex, it just returns TRUE. This value is interpreted by CSingleLock::Unlock as though the object got freed and it sets its m_bAcquired member to FALSE. This causes the Mutex to lock up, because any future calls to CSingleLock::Unlock see m_bAcquired to be FALSE and the call to CSyncObject::Unlock is not made. When CSingleLock's destructor gets called, it calls Unlock. However, the same sequence of events prevents the Mutex from being freed.
RESOLUTIONThe first version of CSingleLock::Unlock, the one that takes no arguments, should be used. This calls CSyncObject::Unlock(void). This is a virtual function that calls CMutex::Unlock, that, in turn, calls ::ReleaseMutex to free the Mutex object.
STATUSThis behavior is by design.
MORE INFORMATION
Sample CodeThe following code demonstrates the problem:
//....... CSingleLock* sLock = new CSingleLock (&GlobalMutex); sLock->Lock(); //... sLock->Unlock(1); //... delete sLock; //.......This code should be changed to:
//...... CSingleLock* sLock = new CSingleLock (&GlobalMutex); sLock->Lock(); //.... sLock->Unlock(); //... delete sLock; //....... |
Additional reference words: 4.10
© 1998 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use. |