DOCERR: MASM 6.0 Programmer's Guide Errors: Chapters 1-6

ID: Q80131

The information in this article applies to:

Microsoft Macro Assembler for MS-DOS, versions 6.0, 6.0a, 6.0b
Microsoft Macro Assembler for OS/2, version 6.0

SUMMARY

The following is a list of documentation additions and corrections for Chapters 1 through 6 of the "Microsoft Macro Assembler Programmer's Guide" for version 6.0. The section and page numbers are listed first, followed by a description of the addition or correction.

MORE INFORMATION

Section 1.3.3, Page 35

At the bottom of the page, the description for the .ERRDIF directive states:

...ERRIDNI and .ERRDIFI perform the same action but are case sensitive.

This is incorrect. The line should read:

...ERRIDNI and .ERRDIFI perform the same action but are *not* case sensitive.

Section 2.2.4, Page 44

The last sentence of the second paragraph in this section should read:

These *five* directives also prevent instructions from appearing...

Section 3.3.2, Page 76

The very last line of sample code on this page is


   mov     ax, BYTE PTR [bx] ; Legal

which is moving an 8-bit value into a 16-bit register. This is misleading in the context of the example. It would make more sense as follows:


   mov     al, BYTE PTR [bx] ; Legal

Section 4.2.4.1, Page 100

The sample code at the top of this page has two comments that should be reversed. The comment


   ; 8-bit signed multiply

precedes the code that is doing *unsigned* multiplication with MUL. The comment should be:


   ; 8-bit *unsigned* multiply

The next piece of code is preceded by the comment:


   ; 16-bit unsigned multiply

This is incorrect. The comment should read:


   ; 16-bit *signed* multiply

Section 5.1.1, Page 112

Beneath the description of the DUP syntax, the text reads:

The count value sets the number of times to repeat the last initialvalue

This is incorrect; instead, the description should be:

The count value sets the number of times to repeat the entire list 'initialvalue [,initialvalue]...'

Section 5.1.1, Page 113

The second line of the sample code at the bottom of the page should be:


   shl     si, 1   ; Scale for word referencing

Section 5.1.2, Page 115

The second code example, which describes how to declare an array of pointers to strings, has a typographical error on the third to the last line. Instead of


   pmsg2  BPBYTE  msg2

it should read as follows:


   pmsg2  PBYTE  msg2

Section 5.1.3.1, Page 120

The first step of a repeat sequence is described as:

Checks the CX register and exits if CX is 0. If the REPE prefix is used, the loop exits if the zero flag is set; if REPNE is used, the loop exits if the zero flag is clear.

This second part of this step is incorrect. The zero flag is not checked until step five, at which time it will decide whether to terminate the loop.

Section 5.2.2, Page 128

The last comment in the sample code on this page is incorrect. It states that the last line of code "Allocates and initializes 10 unions," when in fact it allocates and initializes 20 unions.

Section 5.2.2, Page 128

The diagram on this page is misleading. It shows the 2-byte values listed sequentially in memory as high byte followed by low byte (for example, |0 2|0 2|0 2|), when values are actually stored in memory as low byte followed by high byte (for example, |2 0|2 0|2 0|). Furthermore, the last element of this array is shown to be "array[18]", when the last element is supposed to be "array[38]".

Section 5.2.3, Page 132

The diagram on this page is is misleading. The sample code shows a WORD value being loaded with the decimal value 40, but the diagram shows it stored in memory as:


   -----------
   | 4 0 0 0 |
   -----------

This is confusing because the element that is supposed to contain the decimal value 2 is shown as:


   -----------
   | 2 0 0 0 |
   -----------

It would be more understandable if the sample code loaded the two array elements with the hexadecimal values 40h and 2h so the four digits in the diagram corresponded to the four hexadecimal digits in a WORD value as follows:


   -----------------------
   | 40 00 | ... | 02 00 |
   -----------------------

Section 5.3.1, Page 136

The first sentence of the second paragraph is misleading. It should read:

Global labels and macro names must all be unique. Record field names must also all be unique, but record field names can have the same names as structure field names, macro names, or global labels.

Section 5.3.2, Page 137

The syntax for defining record variables with the DUP operator is misleading. It should read:


   [name] recordname constant DUP ([record_initializer
                                   [,record_initializer]...])

Section 5.3.3, Page 139

The sample code on this page has two errors:

The comments show the binary arithmetic that takes place but uses an incorrect operand. The numbers should resemble the following (notice the first bit of the first line):


          1101 1001
      AND 1000 1111
          ---------
          1000 1001
       OR 1000 0000
          ---------
          1000 1001
      XOR 0000 1000
          ---------
          1000 0001

The condition of the IF statement towards the bottom of the example is shown as "(WIDTH color) GE 8". While this is syntactically correct, it will not do what it is supposed to accomplish. The line should be:
```
      IF  (WIDTH color) GT 8 
```

Additional query words: 6.00

Keywords :
Version : :6.0,6.0a,6.0b
Platform :
Issue type :