FIX: Jvc.exe Gives Ambiguity Error on Overloaded Methods
ID: Q177166
|
The information in this article applies to:
-
Microsoft SDK for Java, versions 2.0, 2.01, 2.02
-
Microsoft Visual J++, versions 1.0, 1.1
SYMPTOMS
When using the new Java compiler provided in the Microsoft SDK for Java 2.0
(Jvc.exe version 1.02.4337), compiling code with overloaded methods whose
parameters are various combinations of double and long types gives the
following error:
Ambig.java(14,5) : error J0079: Ambiguity between
'void Ambig.foo(double d, long l)' and 'void Ambig.foo(long l, double
d)'
CAUSE
A bug in the Java Compiler (Jvc.exe) produces this error when the
overloaded method that takes two doubles appears in the code first and
directly before the method that takes two longs.
RESOLUTION
To work around this problem, either move the method that takes two doubles
to any point in the class after the method that takes two longs, or move
the method that takes two longs anywhere in the code after the other
overloaded methods.
STATUS
Microsoft has confirmed this to be a bug in the Microsoft products listed
at the beginning of this article.
This bug was corrected in Microsoft virtual machine contained in the SDK for Java 3.0 and later.
MORE INFORMATION
To reproduce the problem, compile the following code:
public class Ambig
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
Ambig b = new Ambig();
b.foo((long)1, (double)2);
b.foo((double)1, (long)2);
b.foo(1,2);
b.foo(1.5,2.5);
// pause for user to press return
try{System.in.read();}catch(Exception e){}
}
public void foo(double d, double d2)
{
System.out.println("Double = "+d+" Double2 = "+d2);
}
public void foo(long l, long l2)
{
System.out.println("Long = "+l+" Long2 = "+l2);
}
public void foo(long l, double d)
{
System.out.println("Long = "+l+" Double = "+d);
}
public void foo(double d, long l)
{
System.out.println("Double = "+d+" Long = "+l);
}
}
You should see the following error:
Ambig.java(14,5) : error J0079: Ambiguity between
'void Ambig.foo(double d, long l)' and 'void Ambig.foo(long l, double
d)'
To work around this problem, change the order of the overloaded methods to
the following:
public void foo(long l, long l2)
{
System.out.println("Long = "+l+" Long2 = "+l2);
}
public void foo(long l, double d)
{
System.out.println("Long = "+l+" Double = "+d);
}
public void foo(double d, long l)
{
System.out.println("Double = "+d+" Long = "+l);
}
public void foo(double d, double d2)
{
System.out.println("Double = "+d+" Double2 = "+d2);
}
-or-
public void foo(double d, double d2)
{
System.out.println("Double = "+d+" Double2 = "+d2);
}
public void foo(long l, double d)
{
System.out.println("Long = "+l+" Double = "+d);
}
public void foo(double d, long l)
{
System.out.println("Double = "+d+" Long = "+l);
}
public void foo(long l, long l2)
{
System.out.println("Long = "+l+" Long2 = "+l2);
}
REFERENCES
For the latest Knowledge Base articles and other support information on
Visual J++ and the SDK for Java, see the following page on the Microsoft
Technical Support site:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/visualj/
http://support.microsoft.com/support/java/
Additional query words:
Keywords : kberrmsg kbnokeyword kbSDKJava300fix kbVJ kbSDKJava310fix
Version : WINDOWS:1.0,1.1,2.0,2.01,2.02
Platform : WINDOWS
Issue type : kbbug