FIX: CSyncObject::Lock Always Returns TRUE for Finite Waits
ID: Q141533
|
The information in this article applies to:
-
The Microsoft Foundation Classes(MFC)
-
Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Editions, version 4.0
SYMPTOMS
The CSyncObject::Lock function always returns TRUE for finite values of
timeout intervals. This happens even if the synchronization object is in a
non-signaled state.
CAUSE
CSyncObject::Lock is supposed to return FALSE only when the synchronization
object is in a non-signaled state. The current implementation of this
function makes a call to ::WaitForSingleObject and returns FALSE only when
::WaitForSingleObject returns WAIT_FAILED. This is incorrect.
::WaitForSingleObject returns WAIT_FAILED only when the call itself fails.
When it succeeds, it can return a variety of values, with only
WAIT_OBJECT_0 indicating that the synchronization object is in a signaled
state.
CSyncObject::Lock is a virtual function that is overridden only in the case
of CCriticalSection. Hence the problem arises if you work with a CEvent,
CMutex, or a CSemaphore object. The problem also comes up if you work with
the CSingleLock class and call CSingleLock::Lock. This is because
CSingleLock::Lock calls CSyncObject::Lock through its synchronization
object.
In the case of finite timeout intervals, if the object is non-signaled,
::WaitForSingleObject returns WAIT_TIMEOUT. The CSyncObject::Lock should
return FALSE but its current implementation returns TRUE. The return value
from the Lock function is also TRUE when ::WaitForSingleObject returns
WAIT_ABANDONED indicating that the thread that owned this synchronization
object (a CMutex) terminated before releasing it.
RESOLUTION
The easiest way to fix the problem is to derive a new class from the
synchronization object class that is being used (CEvent, CMutex, or
CSemaphore). The only function that needs to be overridden is the
CSyncObject::Lock function. Because this function is virtual, if you work
with an object of your derived class, your derived class' implementation of
Lock will be called. The Lock function in the new class (assuming it is
called CMyEvent) should be implemented as:
BOOL CMyEvent::Lock(DWORD dwTimeout)
{
if (::WaitForSingleObject(m_hObject, dwTimeout) == WAIT_OBJECT_0)
return TRUE;
else
return FALSE;
}
Please see the "Sample Code" section of this article for an illustration
showing how to work around the problem. The sample code gives the
definition of a class derived from the CEvent class and its implementation.
In the case of CMutex and CSemaphore, you need to proceed in the same
manner. You need to derive new classes and override the Lock function in an
identical fashion.
The correct CSyncObject::Lock :
BOOL CSyncObject::Lock(DWORD dwTimeout)
{
if (::WaitForSingleObject(m_hObject, dwTimeout) == WAIT_OBJECT_0)
return TRUE;
else
return FALSE;
}
STATUS
Microsoft has confirmed this to be a bug in the Microsoft products
listed at the beginning of this article. This bug was corrected in
Visual C++ 4.1.
REFERENCES
Sample Code
/* Compile options needed: Default Options
*/
// The Myevent.h File
#ifndef _MY_EVENT_
#define _MY_EVENT_
class CMyEvent : public CEvent
{
DECLARE_DYNAMIC(CMyEvent)
// Constructor
public:
CMyEvent(BOOL bInitiallyOwn = FALSE, BOOL bManualReset = FALSE,
LPCTSTR lpszName = NULL,
LPSECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpsaAttribute = NULL) :
CEvent(bInitiallyOwn, bManualReset, lpszName,
lpsaAttribute)
{ }
// Operations
public:
BOOL virtual Lock (DWORD dwTimeout = INFINITE);
};
#endif
// The Myevent.cpp File
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <afxmt.h>
#include "myevent.h"
IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC (CMyEvent, CEvent)
BOOL CMyEvent::Lock(DWORD dwTimeout)
{
if (::WaitForSingleObject(m_hObject, dwTimeout) == WAIT_OBJECT_0)
return TRUE;
else
return FALSE;
}
Additional query words:
kbVC400bug CSyncObject 4.00 Lock WAIT_TIMEOUT Windows 95 4.10
Keywords : kbcode kbMFC kbThread kbVC kbVC410fix
Version : 4.00 | 4.00
Platform : NT WINDOWS
Issue type :