INFO: Avoid Data Peeking in Winsock
ID: Q192599
|
The information in this article applies to:
-
Microsoft Win32 Software Development Kit (SDK)
SUMMARY
Peeking for data in Winsock means that an application requests for the
amount of incoming data waiting to be received without actually receiving
it. This is a holdover from Winsock 1.1 compatibility with Unix BSD
Sockets. In Winsock, this is accomplished with either recv/WSARecv(...,
MSG_PEEK) or ioctlsocket(FIONREAD, ...). You should avoid doing this
because it is highly inefficient, and it subjects an application to an
incorrect data count.
MORE INFORMATION
Socket implementation relies on fixed-size internal send and receive
buffers that are allocated as necessary from contiguous, non-paged pool
memory. The default size of these buffers is 8k each. Incoming network data
is placed into the internal receive buffer for the socket.
Winsock applications that use one of the peek methods, with either
recv/WSARecv(..., MSG_PEEK) or ioctlsocket(FIONREAD, ...), to obtain the
amount of data in the receive buffer is highly inefficient because the
system must lock the data and count it. As the system does this, it is
likely that the real-time network will still attempt to fill the buffer
with more data. Peeking also does not remove the data, which would allow
the buffer to reach its storage limit. As a result, this closes down the
network data-flow rate and makes the entire process of data transmission
inefficient.
Polling on a stream socket until a certain number of bytes or a "message"
arrives is bad code. A stream socket, such as TCP, does not preserve
message boundaries because it provides a data stream. As such, the largest
message size an application can ever depend upon is one-byte in length.
Code that uses peeking to wait until a complete "message" arrives might
never succeed on stream-based protocols in Winsock where the data straddles
multiple system buffer boundaries, due to design decisions. The peek
operation will report the number of bytes up until the first buffer
boundary. The bytes remaining in the other boundaries might never be
reported, resulting in an incorrect count of data for code algorithms that
depend upon the peek values to be accurate. Subsequent peek attempts will
not reveal the "hidden" data, which can still be received from the buffers.
The best stream-based protocol socket implementation is to drain data
immediately upon arrival into application-allocated buffer space. This
allows the socket buffers to remain open to a steady network data-flow rate
as the application parses the data, resulting in much better network
performance.
REFERENCES
Windows Sockets 2 API Specification, Revision 2.2.0, May 10, 1996 Appendix
C, "The Lame List", Item #20, #26.
For additional information, please see the following article in the
Microsoft Knowledge Base:
Q140263 PRB: recv() w/MSG_PEEK Always Returns Wrong Buffer Size
Additional query words:
Keywords : kbnetwork kbAPI kbNTOS400 kbSDKPlatform kbWinOS95 kbWinOS98 kbWinsock kbGrpNet
Version : WINDOWS:
Platform : WINDOWS
Issue type : kbinfo