The information in this article applies to:
SUMMARY
The FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH flag for CreateFile() causes any writes made to
that handle to be written directly to the file without being buffered. The
data is cached (stored in the disk cache); however, it is still written
directly to the file. This method allows a read operation on that data to
satisfy the read request from cached data (if it's still there), rather
than having to do a file read to get the data. The write call doesn't
return until the data is written to the file. This applies to remote writes
as well--the network redirector passes the FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH flag to
the server so that the server knows not to satisfy the write request until
the data is written to the file.
MORE INFORMATION
The Windows 95 CDFS (CD-ROM File System) does not support the
FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING flag for CreateFile(). While a Windows 95 FSD, such
as VFAT, may implement it, FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING is not a required flag
for file system drivers, and it is not supported by CDFS.
The pointer p is sector-aligned and points within the buffer.
If you have a situation where you want to flush all open files on the current logical drive, this can be done by:
This method causes all buffered write data for all open files on the C:
partition to be flushed and written to the disk. Note that any buffering
done by anything other than the system is not affected by this flush; any
possible file buffering that the C Run-time is doing on files opened with C
Run-time routines is unaffected.
When opening a remote file over the network, the server always caches and ignores the no buffering flag specified by the client. This is by design. The redirector and server cannot properly implement the full semantics of FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING over the network. In particular, the requirement for sector-sized, sector-aligned I/O cannot be met. Therefore, when a Win32- based application asks for FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING, the redirector and server treat this as a request for FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH. The file is not cached at the client, writes go directly to the server and to the disk on the server, and the read/write sizes on the network are exactly what the application asks for. However, the file is cached on the server. Not caching the client can have a different effect, depending on the type of I/O. You eliminate the cache hits or read ahead, but you also may reduce the size of transmits and receives. In general, for sequential I/O, it is a good idea to cache on the client. For small, random access I/O, it is often best not to cache. Additional query words:
Keywords : kbAPI kbFileIO kbKernBase kbNTOS310 kbNTOS350 kbNTOS351 kbNTOS400 kbWinOS2000 kbWinOS95 kbDSupport kbGrpKernBase |
Last Reviewed: January 11, 2000 © 2000 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use. |